On Christmas day of last year, my wife and I decided to take a look at The Tree Of Life, a movie I had heard a thing or two about and that apparently had garnered a strong reputation on the basis of its artistic merits. It seems that most critics loved this movie. I read a portion of an interview with Steven Soderberg where he said one of the reasons he plans to retire from filmmaking is that, after having seen The Tree Of Life, he realizes he doesn't really know how to make great movies. It's just that good.
Okay, whatever. The movie's a little over two hours long, and feels like seven. It wants us to sense the rich interiors of its characters' lives, yet manages to come off as superficial and trite. It tries to wow the viewer with trippy visuals showing the origins of the universe and life on Earth, and instead seems a derivative imitation of the last fifteen minutes of 2001: A Space Odyssey (critics I've read who liked the film compare the two favorably, while at least one other, like myself, shrugged and said, “What's the big deal?”).
I'm so high right now |
I'll give it points for a couple of things. It's beautifully photographed, with sumptuous colors that effectively evoke the sleepy, sultry atmosphere of a Texas suburb. It's the only movie in the history of cinema to contrast the ups and downs (mostly downs) of a middle-class American family in the 1960's with the lives of dinosaurs. Did you ever expect to see a movie that references both the Vietnam war and velociraptors? I didn't. So, kudos for that. It's the one original thing the film has to offer (I make a point of harping on originality because some people talk about The Tree Of Life as if Terrence Malick has ushered in the Second Coming of the Art of Cinema. I don't believe he has).
If you recall, Jurassic Park was also kind of artsy-fartsy |
Mostly, we get a lot of dull, interminable Moments Of Quiet Human Intimacy of the sort that make film studies majors pre-ejaculate in their pants (the main reason theater floors are so gummy).
Shhh...Significant moment in progress |
Oh, and should I mention that Sean Penn is wasted here? He sits around looking tired and mopey, and then climbs around on some rocks. The man's one of the world's greatest actors, and all Malick could think to do with him was have him putter around like someone killing time before a dentist appointment. If you have access to a Ferrari (imagine you have really rich friends), do you just take it for a quick spin around the block, or get out on the open road where you're pretty sure there won't be any cops around? Malick seems satisfied just to look in the glove compartment.
I know how you feel, Sean |
This has been one of the rare instances of an art film getting released to mainstream multiplexes. Unless David Lynch has just put something out, that hardly ever happens. It might go a long way toward explaining why some people are so excited by this thing.
Going a little off subject: now that I've mentioned Lynch, I'd like to say that my favorite art film of all time is probably Eraserhead. After that, Tetsuo: The Iron Man. Both are wild, bizarre, funny, disturbing, and wholly unlike anything that ever came before them.
For that matter, so was 2001: A Space Odyssey.
If you look very closely, you can see where Brad's ear is pierced |