Wednesday, July 24, 2013

World War Z: Zombies Old and New


                                                                                                        Google Images

I went through a phase where I was absolutely sick to death of zombies and zombie movies, until I came to understand that they are now, and perhaps always will be, a dominant fixture in the pop culture landscape. They figure in about half of all movies made in the last ten years, they're in almost every video game (fine by me because I stopped gaming years ago), they're the premise of a hit TV series, I can count on most of the Halloween costumes I see being zombies, and people still tell zombie jokes on the internet. It's just the way things are, and I'll have to get used to it. On some level I wish everyone would drop the subject and find something else to amuse themselves; zombies are way past being hip or edgy, but they've become so rooted in the popular imagination that they're now as much a part of the consumer landscape as Burger King and Windows. I've more or less made my peace with it, but only because I have to if I want to enjoy contemporary entertainment.

In that spirit, I'll say that World War Z is a fine example of the genre as it stands today, even if it doesn't have anything new to say in respect to undead people shambling around taking bites out of the living. The only goal here was to make a fast, rollicking horror/adventure movie with tons of zombies and a lot of gunfire and explosions, and they accomplished that perfectly well. Where they depart from standard-issue zombie fare is in the epic scope they bring to the story; events start in Philedelphia, then move to South Korea, Israel, and finally the UK. Everything that happens is big and intense, with zombie hordes attacking in writhing, spastic waves, providing the film with some of its most memorable visuals. The undead here are of the 28 Days Later/Zack Snyder's Dawn of the Dead variety, running and jumping and swarming like Olympic athletes jacked up on crystal meth. The action has a feverish, skin-of-your-teeth quality that rarely lets up, and when it does start to wind down a little toward the end, it comes as something of a refreshing change of pace.

                                                                                                           Google Images

Where World War Z fails is in its almost total lack of inspiration. I haven't read the novel it's based on, but the impression I get is that it has an episodic structure revolving around stories told by the survivors of a worldwide zombie epidemic. That's original, but none of it shows up on screen. Instead, we get the heavily-armed living struggling against the relentless living dead, a scenario so old it collects Social Security checks. World leaders and the military are at a loss, and there's a race against time to find a cure for zombie-itis. Nothing new there. I know less discerning fans don't look for subtlety, but if producers want to push back against the law of diminishing returns, they need a fresh approach. Humans vs. Zombies isn't going to cut it in the long run, even if it looks epically humongous. What saves the movie from feeling like little more than a big budget remake of 28 Days Later are good performances, particularly from Mr. Pitt, a fast pace, well-written characters, and unique imagery. I won't get the picture of zombies piling and scuttling up a wall like ants out of my head any time soon.

                                                                                                         Google Images

I have to admit to a few biases when it comes to zombie flicks. I saw the original Night of the Living Dead (the movie that created the modern zombie if you ignore Vincent Price's The Last Man on Earth) on Halloween night when I was nine years old, and it had an indelible impact on my still-growing brain. Nothing since has ever recreated the grim, apocalyptic, unearthly feel of that movie for me, an effect achieved mainly through black-and-white cinematography, stilted acting, and a low budget. Not even Romero's follow-up Dawn of the Dead has the same power, though it did up the ante by employing Peckinpah-esque bullet hits and full-color guts. The later forays of Lucio Fulci into zombie cinema are fun, surreal, and a serious trip to watch, but generally feel more silly than scary. Living Dead is the first movie I know of to show the dead as literal ghouls who feed on the living, and while other movies have been more graphic in their depiction of the same material, none have done it more memorably (it's that freaky-ass music that does the trick).

                                                                                                           Google Images

An interesting trend I've noticed in the zombie genre over the last several years is a tendency to tone down the gore, a weird development when you take into account that extreme gore was a primary selling point of zombie movies when the idea was new. Each new entry tried to out-splatter the last, culminating eventually in the ultra-gory finale of Romero's otherwise boring Day of the Dead, and some years later with Peter Jackson's Dead Alive, a film that was so overwhelming in its broad comedy and explosive, manic gross-out pyrotechnics that I naively assumed, right up to the point when Danny Boyle and Zack Snyder resuscitated the genre, it would be the final word in zombies. Clearly that hasn't been the case, and the next generation of dramatists have evidently decided that explicit blood and guts isn't the way to go. I was actually surprised at how tame Snyder's Dawn of the Dead was in comparison to the original, and the same goes for most of the recent crop of zombie flicks. One exception is Shaun of the Dead, which holds back on the gore until one character has his intestines pulled out by an undead mob, even giving us a good look at his empty body cavity as he dies screaming. That one bit is as shocking as anything Romero or Fulci ever did.

                                                                                                         Google Images

You don't have to think on it very long to understand that the main motive behind cleaning up the buckets of blood is to increase ticket and DVD sales. For all its entertainment value, World War Z has a PG-13 rating and barely a drop of blood. Producers want the maximum number of moviegoers to see this stuff, and most people don't want to be alienated by exploding heads and flopping entrails. Diehard gorehounds can seek out more obscure, unrated titles, but zombies are now officially for the masses. In the same way that the iconography of punk rock and death metal has long been co-opted by unthreatening bands on the Billboard charts, the zombie movie is now a relatively safe mainstream product, suitable for Disney and children's costumes. Much like zombies themselves, the commodification of formerly obscure subcultures is not going away any time soon. One more thing old-school fans will have to learn to make their peace with.

                                                                                                         Google Images

No comments:

Post a Comment